Cover: The Economics of Parallel R and D Efforts

The Economics of Parallel R and D Efforts

A Sequential-Decision Analysis

Published 1979

by Richard R. Nelson

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback43 pages $23.00

An examination of the logic of the parallel-path approach to the solution of development problems. If there is considerable uncertainty about the best way to achieve a particular objective, and if it is possible to reduce uncertainty substantially in the early stages of a development effort, parallel work on several alternatives may be a very good strategy. It may even be good strategy to develop completely several systems, test them for performance, calculate their production cost, and then let a production contract for the system that has the best combination of performance and (non R and D) cost. If time is important, a good development strategy should reflect this fact both in running more projects in parallel, and by spending at a faster rate on each of the projects undertaken.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.