Procurement and Management of Spares
Expert InsightsPublished 1966
A discussion of the importance of military materiel, especially spares management, in the total military capability. Spares management includes organization, transportation, storage and handling, repair and cataloging, but it is fundamentally concerned with policies for stock control and determination of requirements. This study focuses on the use of inventory-control theory in the analysis of spares procurement and management. The discussion is presented in three parts: (1) the main choices in modeling logistics inventory and their interpretation; (2) a review of inventory models representing basic analytic approaches with the widest use in logistic systems; and (3) several special topics important to the study of spares management.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1966
- Pages: 40
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: P-3404
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.