The Grand Canyon Controversy--1967 : Further Economic Comparisons of Nuclear Alternatives.

by Alan Carlin, William E. Hoehn

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback18 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

An updating of P-3302 and Congressional testimony by the authors against the Grand Canyon dam projects. Calculation methods have been changed to credit the proposed alternative nuclear power plants with the Federal Power Commission's regular energy value adjustment: half the savings from replacing more expensive steam-generated peakload power. Also, cost-benefit ratios are given at both 3-1/8 (Bureau of Reclamation figure) and 5 percent interest rates. Nuclear plant costs were deliberately overstated for unassailability--if the paper were intended to evaluate current nuclear power economics for private utilities, the authors would endorse figures at least $10 per kilowatt lower. Nevertheless, this analysis finds the benefit/cost ratios of the dams to be 0.52-0.78 to one compared with the nuclear alternatives. The higher the interest rate, the greater the difference, because the dams are more capital intensive. (See also P-3505, P-3541, P-3548.) 18 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.