A comparison of the effectiveness of current methods which measure fighter aircraft system performance. Involving various degrees of simulation, the techniques are (1) modeling (usage of computer programs to calculate aircraft and/or missile flight paths); (2) simulation (usage of one or more pilots on line with a computer and display system, "flying" simulated aircraft in real time); and (3) flight testing (usage of actual aircraft and hardware in simulated combat operations). The techniques are reviewed as to degree of experimental control, ease of variation of parameters, range of parameter variability, cost and time required per case, realism, and credibility. Modeling and simulation are useful to R&D decisionmaking, but must eventually be set aside in favor of experimental and demonstration testing of hardware. However, all three techniques can interact effectively in research programs.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.