Predicting the Future

Norman Crolee Dalkey

ResearchPublished 1968

Opinion is basic to long-range developmental forecasting. The difficulties (such as the influence of dominant individuals, noise, and group pressure for conformity) of obtaining a group opinion through traditional face-to-face interaction led to the development of the Delphi procedures, which are described in this paper. The characteristics of these procedures — anonymity, iteration with controlled response, and statistical group response — derive from RAND's discovery that simply the average of individual opinions, without discussion, tends to be more accurate than group opinion resulting from discussion. The experiments that led to these results involved almanac questions, such as, how many votes did Kennedy receive in the 1960 Presidential election in Texas? An initially wide range of answers were found to gradually converge, improving in accuracy in the majority of cases; the pattern of responses resembled a log-normal curve. Further studies will attempt to dampen the effect of group pressure while amplifying accuracy.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
19 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1968
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 19
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-3948

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Dalkey, Norman Crolee, Predicting the Future, RAND Corporation, P-3948, 1968. As of September 24, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3948.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Dalkey, Norman Crolee, Predicting the Future. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1968. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3948.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.