Lifetime Earnings and Physicians' Choice of Specialty.
ResearchPublished 1969
A study to determine whether lifetime earnings in various specialties influence physicians' choice of field. Although income payments to practicing physicians in certain specialties felt to be "shortage" fields may be a politically infeasible policy instrument for influencing specialty choice, increases in residents' salaries could have some appeal for legislators. The effectiveness of both policies is evaluated. Estimates of lifetime earnings differentials between specialties and general practice are presented. The income differentials do not explain why virtually all medical school graduates enter residency programs. However, choices among particular specialties may reflect interspecialty income differences. Regression equations measuring the supply response to income in several specialties are presented. The results indicate that income payments to practicing physicians and stipends to residents would have only a small effect on choice of field. The author suggests other factors that may influence specialty choice: vacancies in a particular specialty, intellectual stimulation, and prestige. 22 pp. Ref.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1969
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 22
- Paperback Price: $20.00
- Document Number: P-4068-1
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Sloan, Frank A., Lifetime Earnings and Physicians' Choice of Specialty. RAND Corporation, P-4068-1, 1969. As of September 4, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4068-1.html
Sloan, Frank A., Lifetime Earnings and Physicians' Choice of Specialty. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1969. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4068-1.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.