Military-Industrial Simplicities : A Review of Three Books.
Expert InsightsPublished 1970
A joint review of Barnet's The Economy of Death, Len's The Military-Industrial Complex, and American Militarism 1970, excerpts from a 30-man conference with epilogue by Senator Fulbright. Underlying these and many recent books on the subject are premises with which Wolf disagrees --that preparation is provocation, increasing the risk of war, the military is a threat to democracy, and the defense budget is uncontrolled. In constant dollars, current defense outlays are quite close to the Eisenhower budget which Barnet refers to approvingly. Debate on national security issues can be advanced by people with severe criticism and strong antagonism toward the use of force in general, but the participants should devote more thought than they have displayed so far. 6 pp. (MW)
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1970
- Pages: 6
- Document Number: P-4513
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.