Subjective Scaling of Student Performance.

Theodore S. Donaldson

ResearchPublished 1971

A method for measuring performance increments across a wide range of student performance--specifically, by measuring the student's performance in homework and classroom work. A judge evaluates the achievement level from samples of each student's work collected at the beginning and end of the program. Rating the student's work on an assignment common to all, the judge scores either by intersample relationship or by comparison to an absolute value scale. This exercise evaluates improvements in arithmetic and reading skills and affords a criterion for using the standardized tests. The specific assignment scores can be correlated with the standardized test scores. Although scaling techniques appear to be generally useful in educational evaluations, more basic research is necessary to isolate student performance variables, to study individual teacher's grading biases, to determine the various dimensions of student performance, and to identify performance changes. 15 pp. Ref.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
15 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1971
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 15
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-4596

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Donaldson, Theodore S., Subjective Scaling of Student Performance. RAND Corporation, P-4596, 1971. As of September 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4596.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Donaldson, Theodore S., Subjective Scaling of Student Performance. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1971. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4596.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.