Cover: An Optimal Control Model of Product Improvement R&D.

An Optimal Control Model of Product Improvement R&D.

Published 1971

by Robert Shishko

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Given a production function for technical change, this paper seeks to maximize the present discounted value of the difference between its benefits and costs. A model is developed within the context of a program in which an organization attempts to improve the performance of one of its systems subject to an arbitrary fiscal constraint that limits the rate of R&D spending on that system. In more concrete terms, the organization can be viewed as the Air Force engaged in a product-improvement program for one of its jet engines. A fiscal constraint may then be imposed by the Air Force's chief R&D officer or by Congress itself. Predictions of the model are compared with casual observations of behavior and the implications of "austere" budgets are discussed.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.