Multiphase Nuclear Fuel Cavity Reactors for Power Generation

Benjamin Pinkel, Eugene C. Gritton

Expert InsightsPublished 1971

The characteristics and problems of cavity reactors with the fuel in the solid, solid/liquid, solid/liquid/gas, liquid, and liquid/gas states are explored analytically in an effort to uncover interesting operational regimes. Operation with the fuel in a thin liquid film on the cavity wall promises continuous fission debris removal and interesting performance, but poses problems of container penetration by the fuel and gravity-induced fuel flow. These problems are avoided when the fuel film is solid at the expense of power and operational duration.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1971
  • Pages: 7
  • Document Number: P-4701

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Pinkel, Benjamin and Eugene C. Gritton, Multiphase Nuclear Fuel Cavity Reactors for Power Generation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1971. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4701.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.