Logistics -- Its Planning, Programming and Budgeting in the Office of the Secretary of Defense

1968-1970

Bernard D. Rostker

Expert InsightsPublished 1972

A review of the implementation of the Planning-Programming-Budgeting System for logistics which existed in the Office of the Secretary of Defense during the period 1968-1970. While it concentrates on logistics, the insight gained by examining this area should be applicable to PPBS in general. The present system has many shortcomings and as a result the promise of efficient resource allocation has not come to pass. It is important to understand the present system and how it has failed.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1972
  • Pages: 15
  • Document Number: P-4881

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Rostker, Bernard D., Logistics -- Its Planning, Programming and Budgeting in the Office of the Secretary of Defense: 1968-1970. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1972. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4881.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.