Design to Price from the Perspective of the United States, France, and the Soviet Union
ResearchPublished 1973
Describes Soviet military aircraft development style and that of Marcel Dassault in France to show how they achieve successful design at minimal cost. Important elements are: (1) separation of development from production; (2) small design and prototype construction teams; (3) tight deadline and cost constraints but great internal autonomy; (4) competitive prototyping of alternatives for major changes; (5) avoiding multiple innovations — new subsystems are added incrementally to proven designs, in contrast to the "weapon system" approach. The general aim and result is simplicity, standardization of parts and features, and design inheritance, or commonality between generations. In the United States, a formalized adversary approach with excessive regulation of project management stems from a basic concern with equity over efficiency, plus diffused decisionmaking authority. However, U.S. development can be improved by "designing to cost," thus substituting a few external constraints for detailed regulation of activities.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1973
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 9
- Paperback Price: $20.00
- Document Number: P-4967
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Alexander, Arthur J., Design to Price from the Perspective of the United States, France, and the Soviet Union, RAND Corporation, P-4967, 1973. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4967.html
Alexander, Arthur J., Design to Price from the Perspective of the United States, France, and the Soviet Union. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1973. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4967.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.