Cover: The Nature of Uncertainty

The Nature of Uncertainty

Published 1973

by Gene Fisher


Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback8 pages $20.00

A discussion of the dimensions of the problem of uncertainty: the distinction between risk and uncertainty, the phase of the weapon system life cycle, and the level of suboptimization being considered in the decision problem at hand. Seven types of methods that may be used to deal with uncertainty are detailed: Monte Carlo, a fortiori analysis, sensitivity analysis, a "range of estimates," supplemental discounting, adjustment factors, and special studies. Given these concepts and methods, the author outlines the implications for the development of analytical tools and techniques, as well as the implications for Department of Defense policy.

This paper presented at the Department of Defense Cost Research Symposium, Airlie, Virginia, November 1973.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.