The Impact of Police Activity on Subway Crime.

Jan M. Chaiken, M. Lawless, K. A. Stevenson

ResearchPublished 1974

The impact of police manning and apprehension activities on New York City subway crime, with emphasis on robbery, is analyzed for the period 1965-1971. In March 1965, when subway crime was climbing dramatically, Mayor Wagner ordered increased uniformed patrol between 8 p.m. and 4 a.m. Afterwards, the number of felonies decreased both during the hours of increased manning (a deterrent effect) and during the rest of the day (a phantom effect). Displacement of crime is analyzed via the relationship between subway and bus robberies. Robberies are found to be focused on a small number of subway stations, located in areas with high surface crime rates. Stakeout techniques developed by detectives to arrest token booth robbers are effective but do not appear to deter crime. Authors recommend redeploying police to times and locations with high crime, while capitalizing on the phantom effect. 53 pp. Ref.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
53 pages
List Price
$23.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1974
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 53
  • Paperback Price: $23.00
  • Document Number: P-5203

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Chaiken, Jan M., M. Lawless, and K. A. Stevenson, The Impact of Police Activity on Subway Crime. RAND Corporation, P-5203, 1974. As of September 5, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5203.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Chaiken, Jan M., M. Lawless, and K. A. Stevenson, The Impact of Police Activity on Subway Crime. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1974. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5203.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.