A Note on the Analysis of Male-Female Income Differences.
Expert InsightsPublished 1975
Argues that wage discrimination studies using hedonic wage equations must be viewed with skepticism because of the sensitivity of this technique to omitted-variable bias. Greenberg and McCall's R-1343 indicates that women teachers in Michigan receive $539 less on average than comparable men. However, only degree level, and not the exact number of college credits accumulated, was known. For San Diego teachers, this same regression specification yields a $188 average differential. When the six specific classes to which teachers are assigned on the basis of college credits are used in the regression analysis, however, all but $7 of the differential disappears. Apparent sex discrimination in Michigan may thus be a statistical artifact based on omission of the detailed educational information. Without better information on personal characteristics, or more sophisticated statistical techniques, economists stand little chance of isolating the true effects of racial and sex discrimination on market earnings using hedonic wage equations. 8 pp. Ref.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1975
- Pages: 8
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: P-5334
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.