The Pitfalls of Manpower Experimentation.

Gus Haggstrom

Expert InsightsPublished 1975

Controlled experiments to test new military personnel policies on a small scale before they are implemented have many advantages over other techniques for evaluating the potential effects of these policies. However, case studies of recent experiments in the Army and Air Reserve Forces demonstrate the hazards of conducting such studies unless precautions are taken to assure the validity of the experimental results. The Army's experiment to test the feasibility of shortening the term of enlistment in the reserves provides a particularly good example of how not to conduct a field study of this type. The lessons learned from this and other experiments underscore the necessity of following certain guidelines in planning and conducting such tests in the future. 44 pp.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Haggstrom, Gus, The Pitfalls of Manpower Experimentation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1975. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5449.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.