A Methodology for Comparing the Range Performance of Chemically Fueled Submersibles
Expert InsightsPublished 1976
Expert InsightsPublished 1976
Presents a simple, general method for readily comparing the performances of chemically powered submersibles. Particularly useful in the preliminary design phase, the methodology permits quick assessment of the effects on vehicle range of variations in vehicle, engine, and reactant parameters. Criteria are given for determining when the system is weight- or volume-limited. The application of the methodology is illustrated for a submarine displacing 10,000 cubic feet, showing the extended cruise range of a dual-engine system with one engine designed for high speed, the other for low speed. The sensitivities of the cruise and dash ranges to variations in design parameters are illustrated. The paper also discusses the effects of various system parameters on the criteria determining whether the vehicle is weight- or volume-limited for vehicles displacing 10,000 cubic feet and 20 cubic feet.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.