The All-Volunteer Force

Testimony Before the Senate Armed Services Committee, March 2, 1977

Richard V.L. Cooper

ResearchPublished 1977

The all-volunteer force (AVF) has attracted a socially representative mix of the desired quantity and quality of new recruits at a cost substantially less than once assumed. The author outlines how the all-volunteer force has fared since 1971. (1) The Services have met their quantitative recruiting objectives since removal of the draft. (2) Enlisted accession requirements are higher under the volunteer force. The key to long-run success rests in reducing enlisted accession requirements, through reducing personnel turnover rates. (3) The quality of new recruits has increased. (4) High unemployment rates are not responsible for the success of the volunteer force. (5) The AVF regional, urban-rural, and rich-poor composition is remarkably similar to that under the draft. (6) Defense manpower costs have risen but not due to the AVF; they are instead attributable to pay increases and the retirement system. (7) Problems remain with the reserve forces and physician manning.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
5 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1977
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 5
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/P5899
  • Document Number: P-5899

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Cooper, Richard V.L., The All-Volunteer Force: Testimony Before the Senate Armed Services Committee, March 2, 1977, RAND Corporation, P-5899, 1977. As of September 20, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5899.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Cooper, Richard V.L., The All-Volunteer Force: Testimony Before the Senate Armed Services Committee, March 2, 1977. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1977. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5899.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.