Cover: China policy and America's public debate: ten arguments in search of normalized U.S.-PRC relations

China policy and America's public debate: ten arguments in search of normalized U.S.-PRC relations

Published 1977

by Richard H. Solomon

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback43 pages $23.00

As of 1978, leaders in Washington and Peking face the choice of either moving toward future cooperation and defusing the dispute over Taiwan by political means, or through inaction dissipating the policy of normalizing relations which was initiated in 1972 with the Shanghai Communique. The long-term implication of a failure to normalize U.S. relations with Peking is elimination of a favorable element giving strategic flexibility to American foreign policy and a gradual drift back into political hostility with the People's Republic of China (PRC), if not renewed conflict over Taiwan. This paper explores the mood of the American public and Congress on China policy as revealed in public opinion surveys, editorial opinion, press commentary, and the Congressional Record. The author presents a series of responses to the ten most common arguments put forward in opposition to normalization, in this way giving some sense of remaining objections to normalization and how their range of objections to normalization might be narrowed in public debate.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.