Reviews recent research findings on federal support for improved educational practice and recommends changes in policy to take cognizance of the structure and behavior of school districts and state educational agencies. Past federal policy failures can be traced to unrealistic expectations, incorrect assumptions about local school district behavior and poor implementation. Recommendations: (1) Establish area cooperative programs, staffed by practitioners on leave from school districts in a region, to provide assistance to districts for implementation of federal programs, state reform efforts, and local change efforts. (2) Establish a district-based professional growth program to provide for staff development on a regular basis. (3) Revise ESEA Title IV to strengthen state agencies so they can more effectively influence local educational performance. (4) Develop accounting and programmatic control procedures that permit the integration of federal and state or local categorical funds.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.