The President's Commission on Military Compensation
A Review
ResearchPublished 1978
This Commission, headed by Charles Zwick, was created in response to concerns about military costs, effectiveness, equity and morale, and the basic philosophy for setting military compensation. The Commission focused on problems such as retirement, but also managed to deal with minor irritants such as lack of entitlements for junior enlisted men. It struck a careful balance between concerns for cost-effectiveness and concerns for the plight of the individual service member. Regarding retirement, the Commission distinguished between old age retirement and deferred compensation. The recommendation for the old age portion resembles the current Civil Service system. The deferred compensation portion is an innovative plan to establish a trust fund. Those separating from the military could withdraw their portion entirely. For those remaining, up to half could be withdrawn at any time while serving. This plan could reduce total retirement costs by 35-40 percent and encourage those serving 20 years to serve longer.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1978
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 15
- Paperback Price: $20.00
- Document Number: P-6260
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Cooper, Richard V.L., The President's Commission on Military Compensation: A Review, RAND Corporation, P-6260, 1978. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6260.html
Cooper, Richard V.L., The President's Commission on Military Compensation: A Review. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1978. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6260.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.