Total Cost Estimates for Closing Indian Point

by James P. Stucker, Kenneth A. Solomon

Download

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback30 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Based on a review of existing studies, the authors advance a method for estimating the total costs associated with the premature closure of a nuclear power plant facility. The methodology is described in terms of the planned closure of an operational plant but can easily be generalized to cover the forced, immediate closure of a nuclear facility following, say, a severe accident. Illustrating the procedures and the state of current costing information by analyzing the postulated voluntary closure of Indian Point Units 2 and 3, the authors find the differential cost of closure over keeping the units open at between $7 billion and $17 billion. Cost uncertainty of this magnitude seriously degrades the decisionmaking ability of both private and public authorities.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.