East-West economic relations: conflict and concord in Western policy choices

Abraham S. Becker

Expert InsightsPublished 1983

The controversy over East-West economic relations was central in Atlantic alliance discussion in 1981-1982, but subsided in 1983, not because a consensus on basic issues was reached, but largely because attention is now focused on the INF deployments. Major differences between U.S. views and those of its allies--particularly West Germany--are explained in terms of distinctions between normalization and containment as grand strategies of Western relations with the USSR, the objectives of transformation of the Soviet system vs. that of managing the conflict, and pessimistic and optimistic views of the extent and structural imbeddedness of Soviet hostility to the West. These are related to alternative strategies and policies of East-West economic relations--principally, variants of the economic theory of detente and the Reagan Administration's effort to impede Soviet military buildup--in the context of the role of trade and other options for resolving the Soviet growth dilemma. The special problems posed by Eastern Europe are discussed separately. The West's conflicts over the fundamental questions of East-West economic relations remain unresolved. There are prospects for some improved cooperation over specific issues (such as strengthening COCOM) but the scope for agreement seems to be limited. The best that can be hoped for is a damage-limiting strategy of incremental progress.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Becker, Abraham S., East-West economic relations: conflict and concord in Western policy choices. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1983. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6936.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.