A primer on the issues confronting California's juvenile justice system

by Peter W. Greenwood, Albert J. Lipson

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback14 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Juvenile crime is a problem for both citizens and government, not merely because kids do a lot of crime (which they do); and not merely because the seriousness of juvenile crime is increasing (which it has been doing over the past two decades). It is also a problem because of the conflict in values that any attempt at intervention raises. The problem with the so-called rehabilitative ideal of the juvenile system is not that forms of treatment--schooling, vocational training, work experience, behavior modification, group counseling, etc.--do not work. They all work to some degree. The problem is that there is no convincing evidence that one method or program works consistently better than any other--meaning that the design of treatment programs for any particular group of youths is fairly arbitrary. The alternatives to rehabilitation that can be invoked in guiding juvenile disposition policies are the concepts of deserts, incapacitation, and deterrence. These last three concepts are discussed in some detail.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.