Future combat environments: implications for the engine development process
Expert InsightsPublished 1984
This paper reviews reliability and durability features of various aircraft engines; discusses design features that may enhance maintainability and assesses the extent to which they have been incorporated in existing engines; and assesses how demands for more supportable engines are influencing the amount of testing and the calendar time required to develop new engines for use in fighter and attack aircraft. The author concludes that emphasis on reliability and durability is changing the nature of the engine development process, and that maintainability must receive comparable development emphasis if the next generation engine is to operate successfully in more stringent combat environments.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1984
- Pages: 15
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: P-7006
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.