China and Taiwan in 1984
ResearchPublished 1986
ResearchPublished 1986
This paper is adapted from essays written for the Britannica Book of the Year--1985. In it, the author reviews key political, economic, and foreign policy developments in China and Taiwan during 1984. In the case of China, he notes its effort to increase the role of market forces to stimulate urban economic development, and its commitment to a policy of promoting younger, technically skilled officials into positions of responsibility. In foreign policy, China achieved important successes with the United States but fared less well with the Soviet Union. It also concluded a historic agreement with Great Britain that will return Hong Kong to Chinese sovereignty in 1997. Taiwan enjoyed political and economic prosperity marked by a 10 percent growth in its economy, fueled largely by its extraordinary foreign trade performance. It has turned toward more advanced production technologies, and exports of electronics surpassed sales of textiles in 1984.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.