This paper endeavors to provide policy-relevant information that may be used in the continuing public debate regarding the "appropriate" government role in the expanding telecommunications industry. It argues that the debate over the need to regulate cable operators has been driven by the mistaken assumption that the distribution of television programming is a private good; that the debate has overlooked actual pricing behavior in the industry; and that policymakers have not recognized the policy implications resulting from the sunk cost nature of investment made by cable operators. An empirical section evaluates the effectiveness of current state and local regulations, and suggests that they do not appreciably affect the price-cost margins of cable operators, whereas competition from other sources of video programming does have an impact on the market power of cable firms.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.