Assessing benefits and costs of alternative aircrew training simulators for the C-17 military transport

by William Stanley

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback18 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

At the request of the U.S. Air Force, The RAND Corporation examined the benefits and costs of incorporating motion systems in C-17 flight simulators and suggested a general framework for assessing simulator motion requirements. The analysis screened alternatives to identify potentially attractive motion devices, constructed alternative simulator cases with only the motion devices varying from one case to another, assessed important benefits and costs, and used a "scorecard" method to compare benefits and costs. The cases ranged from a simulator using a six-degree-of-freedom motion platform to one with no motion. The costs of motion platforms appear warranted when measured against likely benefits. The study results are assisting in the development of simulator motion requirements for the C-17 and other new systems. The analysis framework permitted the multidisciplinary study team to effectively integrate and present a mix of qualitative and quantitative results.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.