Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Motion for C-17 Flight Simulators: Technical Appendixes
Jan 1, 1986
|PDF file||2.1 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
|Add to Cart||Paperback58 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
This study examines the benefits and costs of incorporating a motion system in the C-17 flight training simulator, and it suggests a standard framework for assessing simulator fidelity requirements in general, and motion cueing alternatives in particular. Using a framework detailed in this report, the research assesses three simulator alternatives: a system having no motion, a system using hydraulic/pneumatic g-seats, and a system using a six-degree-of-freedom (dof) motion platform. If the Air force devises an adequate training syllabus for C-17 simulators and if the program plan ensures that adequate performance data are collected during development, the incremental costs of simulators using six-dof motion platforms appear to be warranted when measured against the likely benefits from their use. Simulators with no motion systems, or those using g-seats, do not appear to be cost-effective for the C-17 training application.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.