Formalization of Tradeoff Rules and Other Techniques for Comprehending Complex Rule-Based Models

by Paul K. Davis, Steven C. Bankes, Robert Weissler


Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback14 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

This paper describes techniques used in a large and complex knowledge-based simulation with thousands of qualitative rules organized hierarchically, which requires recursive combining rules. By formalizing the concepts otherwise implicit in combining rules, the authors have been able to speed model development, communicate results, improve the quality of the rules, and make it easier to recognize when different types of combination rules are needed. The paper's discussion is merely illustrative, but, in the long run, there should be implications for rule algebras in formal modeling and new syntaxes in programming languages. The objective should be to state combining rules at a high level of abstraction.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.