Post INF

Toward Multipolar Deterrence

James C. Wendt, Peter A. Wilson

Expert InsightsPublished 1988

The NATO nations have never had enough conventional forces to deter the Soviets in Europe, and they have relied on NATO's nuclear forces — primarily those of the United States — for deterrence. As Soviet conventional and nuclear forces have grown, the credibility of using U.S. nuclear forces in response to Soviet aggression in Europe has eroded. This paper analyzes the elements of deterrence and examines the best ways to preserve this system; discusses the growing role of British, French, and Chinese nuclear forces in deterring the Soviet Union from aggression; and considers what steps the United States can take to encourage this evolution in a favorable direction.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1988
  • Pages: 33
  • Document Number: P-7407

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Wendt, James C. and Peter A. Wilson, Post INF: Toward Multipolar Deterrence. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1988. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7407.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.