Cover: The Contrasting Ethical Foundations of Terrorism in the 1980s

The Contrasting Ethical Foundations of Terrorism in the 1980s

Published 1988

by Bruce Hoffman


Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback24 pages $20.00

This paper argues that the character of the ethical foundations of terrorism have changed. Increasingly, terrorism is perpetrated by groups with a dominant religious component in contrast to the largely politically oriented groups of the past two decades. Terrorism motivated by a religious imperative is less discriminate than that with political aims, and it therefore encompasses a wider range of targets. In addition, the shift from a predominantly political to a largely religious motivation explains the increase in the lethality of terrorist acts more than does the growth in the number of terrorist groups or their need to commit more violent acts in order to attract public attention.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.