Soviet strategic air defense: the struggle for competence

James T. Quinlivan

ResearchPublished 1988

The Rust incident of 1987 highlighted training deficiencies of the Soviet Air Defense Force and produced a new Air Defense Force commander, General of the Army Ivan Tret'yak. General Tret'yak has introduced a new realism into training and a new openness in admitting failure and difficulties. At the same time, the long-term competence of the organization can only be guaranteed by acquiring high-quality conscripts and officer cadets and training them to high standards. The greatest problem may be the acquisition of these personnel as competition grows for Russian-speaking Slavs with acceptable educational backgrounds--the same people sought by newly emerging sectors of the Soviet economy. Flaws in the current training and personnel assignment systems further inhibit effective education of the officer and support personnel, compounding the difficulties of achieving and sustaining competence.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
16 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1989
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 16
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-7596

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Quinlivan, James T., Soviet strategic air defense: the struggle for competence, RAND Corporation, P-7596, 1989. As of September 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7596.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Quinlivan, James T., Soviet strategic air defense: the struggle for competence. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1989. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7596.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.