Quality-of-care issues for HIV illness: clinical and health services research

by David E. Kanouse, W. Christopher Mathews, Charles Bennett

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback11 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Research on the quality of medical care is needed for evaluating both the quality of medical care and its cost. Quality-of-care research for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) illness is complicated by several factors, including the multiplicity of clinical manifestations, diversity of affected populations, rapid changes in modified natural history and in treatment approaches, and problems of access to care. Researchable questions can be formulated by identifying sizable subgroups of patients that are relatively homogeneous with respect to risk of adverse outcomes and issues of clinical management. Four such groups are patients with early HIV disease, patients with major opportunistic infections, patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome dementia complex, and patients in the terminal stages of illness. For each group, the major research issues concern the appropriate settings, resources, and processes of care and the relevant outcomes, adjustors, and sources of data. Because specific therapies are still undergoing rapid change, research on processes of care that are likely to be important across a range of specific therapies may yield results that are more robust over time. A focus on defined systems of care and on episodes of care that encompass both inpatient and outpatient management may offer a better picture of quality of care than that provided by studying only the inpatient phase of care.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.