The bad apples? malpractice claims experience of physicians with a surplus lines insurer

by Elizabeth Lewis, John E. Rolph

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback23 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

To compare the malpractice claims experience of physicians in a high malpractice risk population to those in a normal population, the authors used claims data from one national surplus lines malpractice insurer and one large standard lines malpractice insurer. In addition, a second surplus lines insurer supplied data on policyholder characteristics that was used to compare the characteristics of physicians across populations. Surplus lines insured physicians had frequencies of claims filed of over twice as high as doctors in comparable specialties insured by the standard lines insurer. Surplus lines insureds had much shorter coverage periods (72% leaving within a year or less) as compared to those with conventional coverage (less than 11% leaving within a year or less). Surplus lines insureds were somewhat older, more frequently board certified and were proportionately more in high risk specialties than the physician population of the country.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.