This paper offers a snapshot of European political, economic, and social trends at the beginning of 1994. It describes the mood as sober if not downcast, with Europe facing the seemingly insurmountable tasks of maintaining progress toward European unity and dampening violence in the Balkans. It discusses the eroding position of national governments in the face of social and technological change, forecasting a kaleidoscope of cooperative and balancing arrangements rather than unity. Anticipating a possible mutual distancing in European-American relations, the paper analyzes the issue of European identity, describing tendencies toward integration as well as fragmentation. Briefly reviewing the role of key states, it points out the absence of European leaders. Noting questions surrounding the effectiveness of NATO and the nature of the expanded European Union, the paper concludes that a U.S. policy of multilateralism requires Washington to encourage its close allies toward a capacity to act.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.