Choosing Force Structures
Modeling Interactions Among Wartime Requirements, Peacetime Basing Options, and Manpower and Personnel Policies
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||1.8 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback27 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
The U.S. military must design force structures today in the face of substantial uncertainties about future military contingencies: Where will military needs arise? What operational and support units will be needed? Options for organizing, equipping, and training units during peacetime include using concepts of tiered readiness, larger versus smaller units, or active- versus reserve-component units — which have different operating costs and use different manpower configuration. The people who staff such units and centralized support organizations include military and civilian personnel in numerous specialties and grades. This paper describes and illustrates an optimization framework that identifies a mix of units of different types, plus a mix of personnel that is practical and that can fill objectives during peacetime and contingencies, in a timely manner. Covering the whole Air Force, the optimization will permit planners to quickly evaluate the implications of such diverse options as (1) deploying forces on altered schedules, (2) stationing fewer forces overseas in peacetime, (3) staffing units in peacetime or during contingencies at different levels, (4) changing training regimens to lower some units' operating costs, (5) altering personnel behavior through incentives, or (6) opening to civilians more jobs that traditionally have been reserved for military personnel.
Research conducted by
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.