Litigiousness, Contract Design and the Economic Motives of the Contingent Fee Lawyer

Sung-Ho Ahn

Expert InsightsPublished 1998

Previous studies of the contingent fee contract between an attorney and client have relied on several unnecessarily simplistic assumptions. The author revised these assumptions and obtained the following results. First, a two-tiered, or sliding scale, contingent fee contract has implications in conflict with those resulting from a simple one-tier contract. Second, the total caseload of a contingent fee lawyer influences his economic motives and may reduce the welfare of some or all of his clients. Finally, the sliding scale contract can explain previous empirical findings comparing outcomes between cases involving contingent fee lawyers and those involving hourly fee lawyers.

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Ahn, Sung-Ho, Litigiousness, Contract Design and the Economic Motives of the Contingent Fee Lawyer. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1998. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P8034.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.