Cover: Cable Television

Cable Television

Opportunities and Problems in Local Program Origination

Published 1970

by Nathaniel E. Feldman

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Evaluates past CATV experience with local programming in Canada; in the somewhat isolated tract of Dale City, Virginia; and in Lakewood, Ohio, a suburb of Cleveland. The study concludes that (1) local programming can cost little to produce, (2) community-oriented programming can at times have high audience appeal, (3) local volunteer groups can produce only a few hours of programming per week to at most perhaps enough for one or two channels, (4) to survive financially, CATV systems generally must import distant stations as well as carry signals from local stations (no other means for attracting subscribers has yet been shown to be viable), (5) CATV operators should be required to rent out equipment, to make available their studios, and to provide free channels for community programming, and (6) CATV operators should also be required to make channels available on a leased basis with the cable operator absolved of responsibility for program content.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.