Access by Local Political Candidates to Cable Television
A Report of an Experiment
ResearchPublished 1971
A Report of an Experiment
ResearchPublished 1971
In an experiment carried out during the November 1970 elections in Waianae, Oahu, Hawaii, local political candidates were offered unlimited free time on the area's CATV system. Questionnaires showed that about 28 percent of the subscribers watched one or more of the ten programs presented. Over 60 percent of these reported that the programs influenced their voting. Most of those who knew about the programs watched at least one, though advance promotion was minimal. Thus, the programs probably played a useful role in the electoral process. Most candidates had inadequate experience in the use of television. Opportunities to use CATV — a less expensive form of television — should improve the skills of local candidates. For future local political programming on CATV, this study recommends (1) adequate advance advertising and promotion, and (2) interconnection of cable systems to cover metropolitan or even statewide areas, so candidates can reach larger audiences. (See also R-570, R-587, R-595, R-689, R-783, R-828, R-888, RM-6199, RM-6309.)
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.