Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback76 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

Outline of the cable television problems of two states, Connecticut and Nevada, and a review of a current debate in New York about the appropriate role of the state in relation to cable regulation. This report summarizes the cable television regulation experiences of these three states and brings out several important considerations in regard to future state cable regulation: (1) to avoid long court tests and resulting delays such as those encountered in Connecticut, legislation should be drawn in a manner to make the rights of the regulating agency explicit; (2) to expedite the hearings and decisionmaking process, franchise certificates should be awarded on an area-by-area basis within the state, rather than delaying the granting of franchises for the whole state until all hearings have been completed; and (3) to facilitate service across traditional jurisdictional lines, careful thought should be given to prescribing appropriate geographical areas for service by a single system.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.