An Experiment on the Sensitivity of A Global Circulation Model
Studies in Climate Dynamics for Environmental Security
ResearchPublished 1972
Studies in Climate Dynamics for Environmental Security
ResearchPublished 1972
The results of a series of six 60-day integrations of the Mintz-Arakawa two-level, global-circulation model, designed to test the hypothesis that sizable changes in boundary conditions could be detected in the solutions even in the presence of uncertainties in the initial conditions. The variables considered are zonally averaged and time averaged values from the last 30 days of each 60-day run; the significance of the changes is tested by a classical analysis-of-variance technique. The model was run with a standard set of initial conditions and with two independent sets of random temperature variations superposed on the initial temperature field. With the ice of the Arctic Ocean replaced with water at the freezing point, the model was run once with the other standard initial conditions and once each with two sets of temperature variations. Changes in boundary conditions in the model are shown to produce detectable changes in the general circulation.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.