Population Growth and Poverty.
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback48 pages | $20.00 | $16.00 20% Web Discount |
Assesses the foreseeable need for public assistance to the poor over the next three decades, and ascertains how this need would differ if Americans averaged three or two children per family. Official 1969 federal standards are used for the present poverty line, with two alternative assumptions: the standards will remain constant; and they will increase at the same rate as per capita money income. Results indicate that the aggregate needs of the poor are not very sensitive to different population growth rates. Results also indicate that even with economic growth, the dollar need for public assistance may decline slowly but could actually increase. To eliminate poverty by the year 2000, economic growth probably will require policies redistributing income toward the lowest income classes. Such a redistribution may be easier to afford in the future than now, because the percentage of the gross national product needed for public assistance will almost certainly decline. 48 pp.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.