Suggestions for Assessing Economic and Demographic Effects of Income Maintenance Programs
ResearchPublished 1973
ResearchPublished 1973
This report examines some of the fundamental research issues that must be resolved before the effects of alternative income maintenance programs can be properly assessed. It summarizes RAND's research for the Economic Development Administration on assessing the regional effects of income maintenance programs, discusses the principal issues and problems in estimating those effects, and provides specific recommendations for future research. The ways in which an income maintenance program might change labor supply, migration, consumption, and investment patterns are described. The report contrasts two alternative approaches to estimating these changes — controlled social experiments and nonexperimental survey data — and then focuses primarily on issues associated with using nonexperimental data. Among the issues examined are the difficult transition from theoretically correct variables to measurable ones, the choice of estimation technique, and the selection of the sample and subsamples. Existing nonexperimental datasets are also compared.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.