Cover: San Jose and St. Louis in the 1960s

San Jose and St. Louis in the 1960s

A Case Study of Changing Urban Populations

Published 1973

by Peter A. Morrison

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Analyzes rapid demographic change in settings of population growth (San Jose) and decline (St. Louis). San Jose's population is youthful and chronically migratory as a result of past growth, and its natural increase and migratory flow-through are likely to continue at unusually high levels. The labor force can probably accommodate quickly to changes in demand. St. Louis's population decline exemplifies the dilemma faced by localities undergoing severe out-migration. As young adults leave, the population's replacement capacity dwindles and the city remains responsible for a disproportionate number of older, needy residents who stay. Eventually, population decline acquires its own dynamic as death rates exceed birth rates. The contrasting demographic trends in San Jose and St. Louis point up a vexing discord between the well-being of people and that of the places they choose to live in or leave.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.