The Financing of National Health Insurance
ResearchPublished 1976
ResearchPublished 1976
How much of the nation's resources should be devoted to health care? To what degree should a national health insurance bill be used to redistribute income? This pioneering study of the way in which the costs of a national health insurance (NHI) program are to be distributed among income groups begins with a quantitative analysis of four prototypical NHI bills in terms of the tax burden and income redistribution they would produce: the Administration bill, the Kennedy-Mills bill, the Corman-Kennedy bill, and the Long-Ribicoff bill. The authors then examine the value judgments that are reflected in the financing provisions of the four bills and identify both areas of agreement and of unresolved controversy among the sponsors of health insurance legislation. Finally, they consider the philosophical disagreement between proponents of a payroll tax and of a premium and suggest possible areas for compromise between opposing factions.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.