Cover: The Costs, Financing, and Distributional Effects of a Catastrophic Supplement to Medicare

The Costs, Financing, and Distributional Effects of a Catastrophic Supplement to Medicare

Published 1979

by M. Susan Marquis

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback126 pages $35.00

Compares two catastrophic plans to supplement Medicare benefits. One limits cost-sharing to a fixed dollar amount; the other varies the limit as a function of family income. Either will increase Medicare program costs slightly more than $1 billion. The total budgetary increase will be only $700 to $800 million, however, because the costs of other health-financing subsidy programs will decrease. Financing the plans would require premiums of $3.50 per enrollee per month, an increase in personal income taxes of 0.55 percent, an increase in payroll taxes of 1 percent, or increases in the current Medicare deductible or coinsurance rate. A major finding is that the type of catastrophic limit and the choice among the five financing methods have only a small effect on the amount and distribution of expected real income changes among the aged; however, the choice of parameters affects the post-illness distribution of income.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.