Cover: Municipal Service Pricing

Municipal Service Pricing

Impact on the Growth of Residential Development

Published 1975

by Benjamin Zycher, L. A. Dougharty, Carole Chew, Isao Kobashi

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback43 pages $15.00

Estimates the effect of development charges--fees paid by residential developers to localities as a prerequisite to the development process--on residential development location choice. An econometric model, using data from 15 cities of Santa Clara County for the years 1966 to 1973, supports the hypothesis that the use of development charges is a relevant policy tool available to localities for the purpose of influencing the rate and pattern of development. This report reviews four alternative pricing policies; some of the policies impose higher costs on the developer than others, and hence would be stronger deterrents to growth. While pricing policy can act to curb growth, it cannot place enforceable ceilings on the rate of growth. Therefore, pricing policy cannot be recommended as an effective growth control strategy. It should play a role, however, in an integrated policy of growth management. (See also R-1878/1, R-1878/2, R-1878/4.)

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.