Cover: Strategic Mobility Alternatives for the 1980s

Strategic Mobility Alternatives for the 1980s

Vol. 2, Analysis and Conclusions

Published 1977

by William E. Hoehn, Robert L. Perry, Jean R. Gebman, A. A. Barbour, James H. Hayes, J. W. Higgins, W. R. Micks, P. C. Paris

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 9.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback150 pages $30.00

This report discusses (1) optional ways of enhancing present and future strategic airlift forces; (2) airlift options being considered by the Air Force; (3) critical uncertainties, including the appropriate mix of outsize and oversize capacity; and (4) an incremental strategy for assessing future commitments. The authors recommend further analysis of C-5A wing problems, accelerated acquisition of spares to support higher surge ratios, resolution of some persistent CRAF difficulties, and a prompt start on work needed to support the procurement of additional outsize airlift capacity. Other important issues extend to (1) exploring with the Army ways to reduce airlift equipment lists and the feasibility of partial prepositioning of heavy but low cost items, (2) clarifying uncertainties in the C-141A stretch program, and (3) the implications of increasing crew utilization rates. The goal of such initiatives is to give the Air Force a better base for evaluating long-term airlift enhancement needs and opportunities.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.