Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback23 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

This report discusses (1) optional ways of enhancing present and future strategic airlift forces; (2) airlift options being considered by the Air Force; (3) critical uncertainties, including the appropriate mix of outsize and oversize capacity; and (4) an incremental strategy for assessing future commitments. The authors recommend further analysis of C-5A wing problems, accelerated acquisition of spares to support higher surge ratios, resolution of some persistent CRAF difficulties, and a prompt start on work needed to support the procurement of additional outsize airlift capacity. Other important issues extend to (1) exploring with the Army ways to reduce airlift equipment lists and the feasibility of partial prepositioning of heavy but low cost items, (2) clarifying uncertainties in the C-141A stretch program, and (3) the implications of increasing crew utilization rates. The goal of such initiatives is to give the Air Force a better base for evaluating long-term airlift enhancement needs and opportunities.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.